PRTR stands for Pollutant Release and Transfer Register. The PRTR system was established in order to determine the "quantities of chemical substances (As of the end of April, 2000, 354 chemical substances were subject to reporting under the PRTR System, due to the high level of environmental risk they possess, based upon the relevant domestic laws & regulations, the level of carcinogenicity and the potential for exposure.) that are handled by factories and business premises (businesses) and are being released into the environment", as well as the "quantities of these chemical substances that are being disposed of as wastes (including the quantities of substances disposed of by waste treatment companies)". The aforementioned pollutant data is to be reported to the competent government offices, where it will then be compiled and later released in the appropriate form.
This information includes the locations and manners in which these chemical substances can harm human health and ecosystems, as well as the locations and quantities of wastes that are released for disposal. By utilizing the pollutant data reported by businesses, it is then possible for government offices, businesses and citizens to reduce the quantities of these chemical substances released into the environment and to minimize their adverse environmental effects.
Thus, it can be said that the PRTR system encourages both businesses and citizens to voluntarily manage and reduce the adverse effects of these chemical substances on the environment.
Products that contain 1% or more of any Class I Designated Chemical Substance (and products that contain 0.1% or more of any Class 1 Carcinogenic Chemical Substance.)

The term MSDS stands for Material Safety Data Sheet (chemical substance safety data sheet). The MSDS contains information provided by the supplier, which pertains to the risks and harmfulness of the particular chemical substance, for the benefit of parties who may be handling the substance.
The MSDS contains the following data: quantities of chemical substances handled (designated by the PRTR Law); the characteristics of the chemical substances concerned, which are used as a basis for the calculation of the quantity released, as well as other information pertaining to the handling of such chemical substances. The manufacturer is obligated to provide the MSDS, under the Law concerning the Examination and Regulation of Manufacture, etc. of Chemical Substances.
(Reply from: Owell Corporation)
We shall provide separate answers to your questions for wastewater treatment systems and for exhaust air treatment systems.
In order to select the most appropriate treatment method, it is important to conduct a quality analysis on the polluted water, in order to determine whether the pollution is organic or inorganic. Wastewater derived from a coating facility can be of complex composition. Therefore, the most effective treatment methods utilize a physical / scientific treatment in conjunction with a biochemical treatment. When selecting the method of treatment, it is recommended that careful consideration be given to whether a well-balanced combination of the following factors are present:
Water used for rinsing contains some of the resins, pigments, amines and solvents that were contained within the coating material. A coagulating sedimentation method, together with activated sludge, are utilized to treat the wastewater derived from the washing of electrodeposition equipment.
The BOD content in booth circulating water will continue to increase, due to the solubilization of resin content, unless paint sludge is continuously removed. Therefore, it is necessary to remove paint sludge before the resin content becomes solubilized. The level of water contamination that can be treated is up to 600 ppm for BOD and up to 150 ppm for COD. Paint sludge recovery methods can be roughly classified into the flotation method and the dispersion method. These methods are compared in the table below:
| System | Flotation Method | Dispersion Method |
|---|---|---|
| Description |
A chemical agent is utilized to cause the sludge to float and concentrate. Floater recovery equipment is used to again float the concentrated upper water layer, then the water is separated from the sludge. The accumulated sludge is finally recovered using a scraper. Part of the circulating water is blow down. |
Paint overspray is dispersed into the circulating water a high SS concentration is maintained. This circulating water is then allowed to pass directly through a centrifugal separation dehydrator for sludge separation and recovery. Part of the water from the dehydrator is blow down. |
| Water Content | 60 - 80%. Slightly viscous | 30 - 40%. Minimally viscous |
| SS Concentration | -500ppm | -3,000ppm |
| Quantity of Chemical Agent Added | Versus coating material: 3 - 10% | Versus coating material: 10 - 20% |
| Retention Time | 5 min | 2 min |
The drying ovens used to cure coatings actually bake the coating film, therefore certain solvents and resin components in the coating decompose into tars during the drying process, adversely affecting the quality of the film. As well, fumes from discharged exhaust air and unpleasant odors eventually become pollution. For treating unpleasant odors, tar is decomposed into carbon dioxide and water at a temperature of 750 °C or higher, with a reaction time of 0.5 - 0.7 seconds.
Traditionally, the direct combustion method and the catalytic oxidation method have been utilized for the treatment of the exhaust air from drying ovens. However, these methods each have their own shortcomings, such as the large exhaust losses that occur with the direct combustion method and equipment deterioration due to catalyst poisoning with the catalytic oxidation method. Therefore, the use of the RTO has become more common in recent years, as it achieves greater rates of heat recovery and has better pollution-reducing effects. When the direct combustion method is used, the exhaust temperature is approximately 50 °C higher than the temperature of the oven. However, when an RTO is used, the exhaust temperature is approximately 50 °C lower than the temperature of the oven. This difference is equivalent to approximately 15% of the entire amount of energy consumed by the oven, thus providing large energy savings.
In conventional facilities, the quantities of air supplied and exhausted are both constant, even when the quantity of production output is reduced. Therefore, at the time of reduced production output, the energy consumption per product actually increases. The direct combustion method utilizes a blowerless burner, thus limiting the fluctuations in the quantities of exhaust air. However, the RTO enables the fluctuations in the quantities of exhaust air to be controlled over a wide range. This is one of the strengths of using an RTO.
A comparison among several exhaust air treatment methods for drying ovens is shown below.
| - | Catalytic Method | Direct Combustion Method | RTO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Temperature (°C) | 350 | 750 | 800 |
| HC Treatment Efficiency under Actual Conditions (%) | 90-95 | 90-95 | More than 98 |
| Auto-thermal Efficiency (%) | 50 | 30-40 | More than 90 |
| Exhaust Temperature after Secondary Heat Recovery (°C) (Compared with the temperature inside the drying oven) |
0 | +50 | -50 |
| Energy Consumption (Secondary heat recovery) | 1.0 | More than 1.5 | 0.9 |
| Variability of Treated Air Volume (Energy conservation measures) (%) | 100-30 | 100-70 | 100-30 |
| NOx | 1.0 | More than 3.0 | 0.5-0.7 |
| Other Special Features |
- Deterioration problems due to catalyst poisons - Requirement for periodic catalyst replacement |
Problems with cracking and damage that occurs at high temperature areas | - |
Traditionally, coating factories in Japan have been operated without stringent regulation and strict laws. Meanwhile, in Europe and the US, new coating materials that incorporate environmentally friendly features, such as high solids coating materials, water-borne paints and powder coating materials, have been developed under stringent VOC regulations. As well, carbon filters that have been developed in Japan are widely utilized in both Europe and the US. The calculation of the VOCs contained within exhaust air is usually performed to determine the quantity of VOCs released per treated area of product (i.e., electrodeposition area) (g/m2). Currently, the European standards of 30 - 40 g/m2 are used for VOCs released.
If building a new coating factory, it is possible to install the latest facilities to properly handle new coating materials. However, in older factories, it is necessary to reduce the quantities of VOCs released, usually by using carbon filters. Carbon filters are composed of pulp-processed activated carbon fiber that is made into honeycomb shaped units.
There are two types of unpleasant odors derived from coating booth air exhaust; the odor of the solvent and a second, putrid odor (odorous components of water splashed from the scrubber). The putrid odor is caused by butyric acid and valerianic acid produced by the bacteria that grow in the circulating water within the booth. The preventative measures for this type of putrid odor are as follows:
1 - 2% of all oversprayed paint will be present in booth exhaust air, even after it has passed through the scrubber. The concentration will usually be 0.5 mg/m3 or less in calibration zones. However, in automatic equipment zones, where large quantities of paint are utilized, the concentration is usually 2 - 3 mg/m3. In booths where the quantities of paint used are even greater, the level of concentration can reach 10 - 15 mg/m3. The dust present in exhaust air may directly result in dust pollution, such as dust falling onto automobiles parked in parking lots, or dust adhering to laundry hanging from clotheslines in nearby residential areas.
As well, this dust indirectly increases dust filtration costs for the pretreatment process for carbon filter treatment, one of the countermeasures for VOCs, by making the treatment itself more difficult to actually perform. Measures to decrease the amount of dust in exhausted air are shown below.
(Reply from: Taikisha Ltd.)
Please consult with the organizations listed in the "List of Contacts for Environmental Administration Classified by National Municipalities" and the "Directory of Regular Members of the National Federation of Industrial Waste Management Associations". This information has been provided as a reference for "Equipment & Systems Used for Environmental Measures" in the "Handbook of New Coating Operations", published by our association.
(Reply from: Asahi Sunac Corporation)
Any energy conservation measures that act to decrease power consumption or reduce the usage of heating or cooling sources, will also therefore result in reduced CO2 emissions. Therefore, any such measures can be considered as countermeasures for global environmental issues.
(Reply from: Taikisha Ltd.)
Since the amount of energy used within the coating booths accounts for approximately 60% of the entire energy consumption of a coating factory, the greatest conservation effects can be achieved if the implementation of energy conservation measures is initiated beginning at the booths. Shown below are the critical factors involved with the energy conservation measures used in each system.
(Reply from: Taikisha Ltd.)